Fontana pays nearly $900,000 for ‘psychological torture’ inflicted by police to get false confession (2024)

Within hours after Thomas Perez Jr. called police to report his father missing, he found himself in a tiny interrogation room confronted by Fontana detectives determined to extract a confession that he killed his dad.

Perez had told police that his father, 71-year-old Thomas Perez Sr., went out for a walk with the family dog at about 10 p.m. on Aug. 7, 2018. The dog returned within minutes without Perez’s father. Investigators didn’t believe his story, and over the next 17 hours they grilled him to try to get to the “truth.”

Also see: Fontana police keep public in the dark on shootings involving officers

According to court records, detectives told Perez that his father was dead, that they had recovered his body and it now “wore a toe tag at the morgue.” They said they had evidence that Perez killed his father and that he should just admit it, records show.

Perez insisted he didn’t remember killing anyone, but detectives allegedly told him that the human mind often tries to suppress troubling memories.

At one point during the interrogation, the investigators even threatened to have his pet Labrador Retriever, Margosha, euthanized as a stray, and brought the dog into the room so he could say goodbye. “OK? Your dog’s now gone, forget about it,” said an investigator.

Fontana pays nearly $900,000 for ‘psychological torture’ inflicted by police to get false confession (1)

“How can you sit there, how can you sit there and say you don’t know what happened, and your dog is sitting there looking at you, knowing that you killed your dad?” a detective said.“Look at your dog. She knows, because she was walking through all the blood.”

Finally, after curling up with the dog on the floor, Perez broke down and confessed. He said he had stabbed his father multiple times with a pair of scissors during an altercationin which his father hit Perez over the head with a beer bottle.

Suicide attempt

He was so distraught that he even tried to hang himself with the drawstring from his shorts after being left alone in the interrogation room. Perez was arrested, handcuffed and transported to a mental hospital for 72-hour observation.

But later that day, the truth derailed the detectives’ theory and their prized confession.

Perez’s father wasn’t dead — or even missing. Thomas Sr. was at Los Angeles International Airport waiting for a flight to see his daughter in Northern California. But police didn’t immediately tell Perez.

“Mentally torturing a false confession out of Tom Perez, concealing from him that his father was alive and well, and confining him in the psych ward because they made him suicidal, in my 40 years of suing the police I have never seen that level of deliberate cruelty by the police,” said Jerry Steering, Perez’s attorney in Newport Beach.

$900,000 settlement

Steering filed a civil rights lawsuit in federal court against the city of Fontana, alleging that police psychologically tortured Perez and coerced a false confession without first determining that the father had actually been slain. The suit was recently settled for nearly $900,000.

Perez agreed to the settlement rather than take the case to trial out of concern that a jury award could be overturned on appeal on grounds of qualified immunity for police. Generally, qualified immunity protects law enforcement officers unless they violate clearly established law arising from a case with nearly identical facts, according to the Legal Defense Fund.

Fontana police did not return an email seeking comment. Three of the involved officers remain employed with the department. One other officer has retired.

Why police were suspicious

So how could this happen?

In court documents and depositions, police say they had reason to believe Perez was lying.

First, they noted he seemed “distracted” and “unconcerned” during the 911 call, according to court records. Officers responding to the call noted the father’s cellphone and wallet were still at the home, which was in disarray. Police saw the mess as a sign of a struggle, but Steering said Perez was renovating the house and had argued with his father about it.

Additionally, a police dog sniffed out the scent of a corpse in the father’s bedroom. And there were small blood stains in the house. Steering later would say the blood stains were caused by the father’s finger-prick diabetes tests.

Perez’s lawsuit claims detectives also refused for several hours to retrieve his medication for high blood pressure, asthma, depression and stress.

Fontana pays nearly $900,000 for ‘psychological torture’ inflicted by police to get false confession (2)

Emotional distress

Perez became so distraught that he began pulling out his hair, hitting himself, making anguished noises and tearing off his shirt while police encouraged him to confess, according to a summary of the case written by U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee.

“He was sleep deprived, mentally ill and significantly undergoing symptoms of withdrawal from his psychiatric medications,” Gee wrote.

At one point during the interrogation, investigators drove Perez to get coffee and then to some housing tracts where he had been looking to buy. Detectives berated Perez, insisting he did not need his medication and that they knew he killed his father, according to the case summary.

“When can you take us to show us where Daddy is?” asked one of the investigators.

Also see: Recording shows Fontana police shooting fleeing suspect, say he had gun

Later, during their interview, the detectives told Perez his father’s body actually had been found already.

Asked in a deposition about his line of questioning, one of the detectives said: “I believed at the time if we told him that we had located the body, then maybe he would give us more information about what had occurred.”

Police, in court records, insisted Perez was voluntarily undergoing questioning and was free to go at any time. However, in her case summary, Gee wrote that the “circ*mstances suggested to Perez that he was not free to leave.”

She also noted that there was “no legitimate government interest that would justify treating Perez in this manner while he was in medical distress.”

Father turns up alive

Perez’s nightmare ended shortly after police got a phone call from his sister, who said their father was alive and well. He had actually walked to the train station in Fontana and rode the line to Los Angeles County to visit a relative and then took a bus to visit a female friend, Steering said. Perez Sr. later went to the airport to await a flight to Oakland to visit his daughter.

Police picked up the father at the airport and brought him to the Fontana station.

But the investigation didn’t stop there. Detectives obtained a warrant to again search Perez’s house for evidence that he had assaulted an “unknown victim,” according to Gee’s summary.

It appears none was found.

Perez was not released until after the end of the three-day psychological observation period. He then retrieved his dog from Riverside County Animal Services, tracking her down through an implanted chip, Steering said.

While Gee concluded Fontana detectives had sufficient reason to believe an offense had been committed, she criticized officers for their interrogation tactics.

“A reasonable juror could conclude that the detectives inflicted unconstitutional psychological torture on Perez,” Gee wrote in her summary judgment. “Their tactics indisputably led to Perez’s subjective confusion and disorientation, to the point he falsely confessed to killing his father, and tried to take his own life.”

Fontana pays nearly $900,000 for ‘psychological torture’ inflicted by police to get false confession (2024)

FAQs

Fontana pays nearly $900,000 for ‘psychological torture’ inflicted by police to get false confession? ›

The city recently paid nearly $900,000 to settle a federal lawsuit by Thomas Perez Jr., who alleged investigators grilled him for 17 hours in August 2018 — even suggesting his pet Labrador Retriever would be euthanized — to get him to confess to killing his father.

Is it unlawful for police to force confession from someone? ›

If a statement or confession is "involuntary," it can't come in at trial. Under the Fifth Amendment, suspects cannot be forced to incriminate themselves. And the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits coercive questioning by police officers.

What is a confession obtained under torture? ›

The United States Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Mississippi (1936) established conclusively that confessions extracted through the use of physical brutality violate the Due Process Clause.

What is the punishment for a false confession? ›

The individual may be charged and found guilty of committing perjury; The individual may be charged and found guilty of lying to a police officer; and/or. The individual may be held in contempt of court if the false confession occurs in court and causes a disruption in the court proceedings.

What is the psychology of false confessions? ›

An innocent person may also falsely confess because of increased stress, mental exhaustion, promises of lenient sentences, or challenges with understanding their constitutional rights.

Can cops lie to get a confession? ›

It is almost always legal for police to lie during interrogations. Police have long been prohibited from using physical force during interrogations, but they are still allowed to use a variety of powerful psychological ploys to extract confessions from people.

What would make a confession inadmissible in court? ›

THE PROSECUTION MUST SHOW THAT THE CONFESSION WAS NOT EXTRACTED BY ANY SORT OF THREAT OR VIOLENCE OR OBTAINED BY ANY PROMISE OR EXERTION OF IMPROPER INFLUENCE. ANY STATEMENT OF A CONFESSIONAL NATURE RECORDED BY A POLICE OFFICER IS INADMISSIBLE IN EVIDENCE, EVEN IF THE STATEMENT HAS BEEN MADE VOLUNTARILY.

What is evidence of torture? ›

Documenting torture

The MLR forensically documents evidence of torture. Our team of specially trained doctors conducts a detailed examination of each person referred to us, assessing scars, fractures and other injuries, as well as mental health problems, that have been caused by torture.

What is a coerced compliant false confession? ›

Coerced-compliant false confessions are those in which a suspect confesses to police in order to escape an aversive interrogation, avoid an explicit or implied threat, or gain a promised or implied reward.

What is torture tainted evidence? ›

International law prohibits reliance on 'torture evidence' because: (a) statements made as a result of torture are involuntary, inherently unreliable and violate the right to a fair trial; (b) to rely on such evidence undermines the rights of the torture victim; (c) it indirectly legitimises torture and in so doing ...

What is police coercion? ›

Use of intimidation by officers in the interrogation room. Excessive psychological force or any form of physical force. Telling a suspect that they have evidence tying them to a crime when no such evidence exists. Informing a suspect that their penalty will worsen if they do not confess.

How to prove a false confession? ›

Social science research on wrongful convictions, however, has demonstrated that there are four ways to prove a confession is false: (1) when it can be objectively established that the suspect confessed to a crime that did not happen (e.g., the presumed murder victim is found alive); (2) when it can be objectively ...

What are the three types of false confessions? ›

Under criminal laws, there are different types of false confessions. These include voluntary false confessions, compliant false confessions, and persuaded false confessions.

Which type of person is most likely to give a false confession? ›

Wrongly accused people may be more likely to give false confessions if they are young, mentally impaired or facing tactics such as coercion and threats.

What are some famous examples of false confession? ›

Martin Tankleff falsely confessed to the murder of his parents, who were attacked and killed in their home in 1988, on the first day of then 17-year-old Marty's senior year of high school, in Port Jefferson, New York (on Long Island). Marty served almost 18 years of his 50-year prison sentence before being exonerated.

How many people are in jail for false confessions? ›

If approximately 27% of the total number of exoneration cases involved a false confession and if 10% of the two million men and women imprisoned in the United States are innocent, as estimated by the Department of Justice, than we can gather that as many as 50,000 of their convictions involved false confessions.

What is it called when police force confession? ›

Answer: A coerced confession is a confession that's not voluntary. So, even if somebody waives their Miranda rights and agrees to submit to a police interrogation, there are certain standards that the police must follow in order for the confession or the admission or the statement to be considered voluntary.

Which amendment prevents police from forcing a confession? ›

2. Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Exclusion of Confessions | Constitutional Exclusion: The Rules, Rights, and Remedies that Strike the Balance Between Freedom and Order | Oxford Academic.

Can you be forced to confess? ›

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects U.S. citizens from being forced to incriminate themselves, including false confessions or the result of coercion. Often a suspect will Plead the Fifth on the witness stand. He may or may not be innocent of the charges he's facing. Anyone can Plead the Fifth.

What is an illegal confession? ›

Involuntary Confessions. Due process is violated when police coerce a suspect into making a confession. Coercion may include: (i) physical force; (ii) depriving the suspect of food, sleep, or the ability to communicate with the outside world; or (iii) psychological ploys such as threats or promises.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Melvina Ondricka

Last Updated:

Views: 5540

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (68 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Melvina Ondricka

Birthday: 2000-12-23

Address: Suite 382 139 Shaniqua Locks, Paulaborough, UT 90498

Phone: +636383657021

Job: Dynamic Government Specialist

Hobby: Kite flying, Watching movies, Knitting, Model building, Reading, Wood carving, Paintball

Introduction: My name is Melvina Ondricka, I am a helpful, fancy, friendly, innocent, outstanding, courageous, thoughtful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.